Realmo
Get 1 free verdict

Investigation Desk · AI image detector

Detect AI-generated
images before they pass for proof.

Use Realmo's AI image detector to check whether a photo, screenshot, profile picture, receipt, or product image was likely generated or heavily edited by AI. Upload once, get a verdict, confidence level, and the visual signals that pushed the call.

Profiles, receipts, listings, evidenceOne starter verdict after sign-upVerdict + confidence + evidence
Try the detectorRead the FAQ

Subject

File /REALMO·260611·0055

Drop or paste an image here.

Sign up to take your first verdict — one is on the house.

Sign up to upload

§ What It Checks

Six ways an image
gives itself away.

Realmo does not rely on filenames or hidden metadata. The detector reads the pixels and scores the visible cues that tend to separate a camera-made image from a generator-made one.

  1. Check № 01Texture

    Micro-detail that feels painted in

    Synthetic images often smooth away the messy sensor texture that cameras naturally leave behind. Skin, hair, paper, food, and fabric can look too polished or too evenly detailed.

  2. Check № 02Physics

    Light that does not fully agree

    Reflections, shadow edges, and bounce light should tell one coherent story. Generated images often get close, then drift in the small places your eye notices second.

  3. Check № 03Geometry

    Perspective that slips at the edges

    Frames, hands, product seams, receipts, and architectural lines tend to reveal subtle warping when an image was composed by a generator rather than captured by a lens.

  4. Check № 04Semantics

    Text, symbols, and tiny objects that wobble

    Badges, logos, packaging copy, jewelry, and interface text still betray many generated images, especially after reposting, cropping, or compression.

  5. Check № 05Edits

    Signs of synthetic fill or retouching

    Even when the base photo is real, generative edits can leave local residue around faces, backgrounds, empty space, or cleaned-up surfaces.

  6. Check № 06Camera

    Real capture cues that support authenticity

    Natural blur, believable depth, compression history, and uneven noise are all useful counter-signals. Realmo looks for reasons not to over-call a real photo as fake.

§ Field Use

Built for images
that can cost trust.

The middle of the page now does one job: show where this detector fits in the real world, what the result includes, and what kind of review it should trigger next.

Result Sheet

One upload,
a reviewable readout.

Realmo is not meant to spit out a magic answer. It gives reviewers a compact report they can act on quickly, then verify with source context.

  1. 01

    A single verdict: likely authentic or likely generated

  2. 02

    A confidence score that tells you how hard the model is leaning

  3. 03

    Evidence notes tied to visible cues in the image itself

  4. 04

    A signal breakdown so reviewers can inspect why it leaned that way

  5. 05

    A short fingerprint you can use to refer back to the checked file

Profile pictures and impersonation

Triage suspicious headshots before they enter marketplaces, communities, or onboarding flows.

Receipts, claims, and evidence

Check images that could influence refunds, reimbursements, moderation decisions, or abuse reviews.

Product photos and listings

Catch synthetic catalog shots, copied listing spam, and images dressed up to look like original inventory.

Screenshots and social posts

Review viral images, altered memes, and supposed proof before they get treated as fact.

Newsroom and research triage

Use the detector as a first pass when verifying inbound visuals from unknown sources.

Internal trust and safety queues

Give reviewers a fast starting point instead of forcing every suspicious image through the same manual checklist.

§ Reading Guide

Treat the score
like evidence, not scripture.

A detector earns trust when it helps humans review better, not when it pretends to replace judgment. This is the operating posture the rest of the page is now built around.

Workflow

Review in
three passes.

  1. 01

    Start with the image that already feels off

    The detector is strongest as a first-pass filter for visuals that affect trust, money, moderation, or reputation.

  2. 02

    Read the evidence, not just the headline score

    Confidence, evidence notes, and signal breakdowns tell you why the model leaned suspicious or authentic.

  3. 03

    Escalate with context before making the final call

    Use provenance, reverse image search, source history, and human review before you treat the result as proof.

Bottom Line

High confidence should escalate review faster. It should not settle questions of provenance, authorship, or intent on its own.

Strongest Use

Fast triage for
suspicious visuals.

  • Generated portraits pretending to be real people
  • Fake receipts, documents, menus, and listing photos
  • Images with obvious synthetic cleanup or inpainting
  • Reviewer queues that need a fast first-pass signal

Slow Down

Cases that still need
human review.

  • Tiny crops, reposted screenshots, and aggressive compression
  • Old scans or low-end camera photos that already look strange
  • Brand-new generators and evasive editing workflows
  • Any decision that needs provenance, authorship, or legal certainty

§ FAQ

Questions people ask
before they trust a verdict.

Question

How can I tell if an image is AI-generated?

Start with a detector, then verify the result with context. Realmo looks for visual evidence such as over-clean texture, inconsistent light, warped geometry, generative edit traces, and the absence of convincing camera-origin cues.

Question

Can this detect AI-edited real photos too?

Yes. The detector is designed to flag fully synthetic images as well as photos that appear to have been heavily altered with generative fill, face edits, or hallucinated detail.

Question

Does a high score prove an image is fake?

No. The score is a strong hint, not legal proof. Use it as triage, then combine it with provenance, source reputation, reverse image search, and human judgment.

Question

What images are hardest to classify?

Tiny crops, heavily compressed reposts, old scanned photos, and brand-new generator outputs can all be harder. Some real images also look suspicious when they have aggressive filters, cleanup, or compression damage.

Question

Do I need an account to use the detector?

You can browse the page without an account. To run a verdict in Realmo, sign up and claim the starter credit, then upload an image for analysis.

§ Editions

Pay once. Use until empty.

Credits don’t expire and never auto-renew. Pick an edition, pay once through Stripe, and the verdicts land in your account in seconds.

  1. Starter

    A single look. On the house.

    $0one-time
    • 1 image to check
    • Credits never expire
    • Full signal breakdown
    Sign up to claim
  2. Most popular

    Field Kit

    Five verdicts for a quick run.

    $1.99one-time
    • 5 images to check
    • Credits never expire
    • Full signal breakdown
    • $0.40 per check
    Sign up to claim

  3. Studio

    Fifty checks for sustained scrutiny.

    $10one-time
    • 50 images to check
    • Credits never expire
    • Full signal breakdown
    • $0.20 per check
    Sign up to claim